Still no apology for Japan’s comfort women

I’m usually not a big fan of CNN News – however, I think there are right on the money with this news story.

Below is a shortened extract (the full article can be read by clicking the link at the bottom of the page).

Of course my recently published novel The Cry of the Kuaka describes the life of Korean Women who were abducted/tricked into going to work in Japan, only to end up serving as Comfort Women in Yokohama. It is vile enough that these things happened seventy years ago – but now a reluctant apologist seems to rub salt into the wounds.

a805708d3798cb7fdc4c2cbb0271513d794abb8d__300x0

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/532319

News Story

Tokyo (CNN)The statement by Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe marking the 70th anniversary of the end of World War II will be parsed and dissected in detail over the coming months and years as its ambiguities and vagueness allow for varying interpretation.

South Korea: Abe apology 'not sincere'

Within Japan opinions are divided along ideological lines — Abe enjoying the support of the right, and criticism from the left with the caveat that reactionaries were disappointed that he demonstrated any contrition at all. Those on the left complained that he failed to clearly express a heartfelt, personal apology and it looked like he was just going through the motions. While Abe may have done just enough to satisfy critics in the United States, and Washington’s pro-Abe Japan hands are touting the statement’s merits, Beijing and Seoul are disappointed by what Abe left unsaid.

 As a leading revisionist, Abe has spent his entire career repudiating apology diplomacy and what he describes as masochistic history. He is a polarizing figure in Japan, a neo-con nationalist who has criticized the 1995Murayama Statement for the past two decades and undermined the 1993 Kono Statement regarding responsibility for the so-called comfort women system.

In contrast to Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, who accepted Germany’s “everlasting responsibility,” for its actions during the same period, Abe conveyed perpetrators’ fatigue, avoiding offering his own apology and expressing hope that future generations of Japanese would not also be required to do so. But calling for an end to apologies before Japan has embraced a forthright reckoning of its shared history with Asia is counterproductive. A recent NHK poll indicated that 42% of Japanese support an apology for the war, while only 15% oppose such gestures. So Abe’s belief that Japan has done enough on the apology front is not driven by public sentiment.

Should Abe have apologized for 'comfort women' again?

 Should Abe have apologized for ‘comfort women’ again?

Abe was vague precisely where he needed to be more specific and spoke of apology in the past tense. On wartime aggression, colonial rule and the controversial issue of comfort women, Abe dodged detailed and forthright acknowledgment of what Japan inflicted on Asians. Afterwards former Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama complained that Abe’s statement did not clearly reflect or embrace the spirit of his historic 1995 statement that serves as the gold standard of Japanese mea culpa. Abe seems in a rush to turn the page on the past before it has been fully recognized.

While he made a circumspect effort to offer the olive branch to China, Seoul is exasperated with Abe’s roundabout and evasive comments. President Park Geun-hye said his speech left much to be desired and that you can’t hide history because it is alive in people’s memories.  Abe’s reference to the comfort women was excessively vague and there was little to assuage Korean sentiments.

Overall, Abe appeared unrepentant, outsourced contrition to his predecessors and failed the apology test. It is naïve to assume that an apology is the magic wand of regional reconciliation in northeast Asia, but equally naïve to think that it is not crucial to the process. After eight months of Abe reducing expectations, his statement exceeded what many expected, but still fell short of what is necessary. Abe remains equivocal about Japan’s wartime past and therefore failed to overcome reservations about his views and leadership.

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/08/15/opinions/japan-abe-wwii-statement-analysis-kingston/index.html

Kia Ora

Roly

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s